LeeNoga

I do not take your point of views as any form of attack babee :-) its all good.

Quote:

If we go back and refer to the thread above that I linked to, if I recall correctly, that ASACP did not like the site that was mentioned, and had reported it multiple times to Customs but were told it was not illegal. Therefore it stands to reason that possibly the guidelines on ASACP's site are not in perfect alignment with those of the law?

I can see where there are inconsistencies, but Sniffy Jr. is being loaned to the ASACP, and we step back, so I am not in the know how Joan Irvine and company are going to handle findings.

Quote:

I want YOU to tell me what YOUR guidelines are, unless ASACP owns this product and will be the ones assuming liability for any damage done to either webmasters or sponsors from its use...

In all honesty, ASACP is our starting point and we hope as a result of Sniffy Jr. within their agency [ASACP] some of these holes can be closed. We hope law enforcement opts to use our tools as well, and further define some guidelines.

But there has to be something universal several agencies can use and we hope to be that solution. This evolution we hope corrects alot of the "grey"....especially with alot more agencies using the tools..

What we are offering sponsors [Sniffy Senior] AKA "Sniffy", is information and flags based on several criteria, what the sponsor does with this information will not be known to us.

We of course understand we need to have this reviewed by counsel.

The techy stuff is always done before guidelines and internal checks, and we have not entered the finite stages yet.

But as we do, we will start a new thread :-)

Thanks KimmyKim for all your input.

We are determined to take this on, or at least start and let time evolve this into a greater welfare for all.