Quote:
Originally Posted by baddog
I have to admit, I am torn. I wanted to stop when you said, "They buy into the whole 2-party illusion, along with everything else that is wrong with our country" because that is exactly what your boy Paul is doing.
But as I was scrolling down to reply I saw, " Forget Ron Paul, THE MAN, it's about the message and the truth. The guy is 76 years old and about to die soon anyways."
Since he [Paul] is not important to your philological revolution, I presume you have a vice-President in mind that will carry on the ideals and still beat Obama. Who?
One other thing, how young of candidates are you hoping for? What is stopping them today?
|
Not sure what you mean by vice-president, but as far as the rest of the GOP candidates I wouldn't trust a single one of them.
You could have had Bush or Kerry. No real difference from a bigger picture point of view. You could have had McCain or Obama, no difference there. This time you will be able to have Romney or Obama. Again, no difference. In my opinion we are screwed as long as the Americans keep voting for these elitist wall-street owned international banking cartel-owned douchebags.
A good candidate doesn't necessarily have to be young, but I get the feeling that most Americans seem to have a problem with an "old" president. Americans are very superficial, they care about things like age and looks.
And for what it's worth, I have seen certain polls where people say that they think Ron Paul has the best chance at defeating Obama head-to-head... but we know he has very little chance of ever being in that position to begin with, so it's kind of a moot point.