GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum - View Single Post

dj_sniffy · 06-11-2003, 09:42 AM

Originally posted by Kimmykim

Hmmm, where is the federal law against the use of the word lolita?

there isn't, thanks to folks like the ACLU protecting our 1st amendment rights. there is also a list of words you can't say on TV. it's not against the law to say "tit", but the corporate monitors won't allow it.

Where is the federal law that says that putting up pictures of 15 year olds in a nudist setting is illegal?

nudists aren't a protected class, like a religious argument, so i think on this point, ya, a 15 year nude girl in a nudist setting, with exposure of genitalia is CP. a pic of the gerber baby or the michelin baby is not CP.

Where is the federal law that says that putting an 18 year old in pig tails and handing her a teddy bear and a lollipop is illegal?

it's not, but sponsors are starting to say, if you are attracting visitors because you are given the implicit direction that you have underage models, then that's what they are fighting. it's not about the law.... we are far from wanting that, it's about internal practices. This whole point of sniffy is not just about dealing with that is legal, it's about what the sponsors want.

if the sponsors say they don't want any websites that have a red background because studies show that it leads to violence in the homes, and the sponsors are against domestic violence, then sniffy or any other enterprising company that can fill the need will step in.

having a red background is not against the law, unless of course it is accompanied by other bad things, but if the sponsor doesn't want red backgrounds on affiliate websites, that's their call and their requirement. so you either change your background to like mauve, or don't sign up with the sponsor.

There is a tremendous difference between what is legal and what the majority of people, here or otherwise, consider to be acceptable. In one sentence you talk about legal, in another you talk about the things I have mentioned above basically as something you will sniff out and work to eradicate.

Sniffy won't eradicate CP from the world, it only points the red flag.

Sponsors won't eradicate CP from the web, they can only kick off those the don't want to be associated with.

People who send in leads to ASACP won't eradicate CP, they can only report it.

ASACP is trying to eradicate the world of CP by their active efforts in finding and tracking CP sites. That's what they do.

The FBI eradicates CP by putting people in jail.

-dj

06-11-2003, 09:42 AM
dj_sniffy Registered User Join Date: Jun 2003 Posts: 47	Originally posted by Kimmykim Hmmm, where is the federal law against the use of the word lolita? there isn't, thanks to folks like the ACLU protecting our 1st amendment rights. there is also a list of words you can't say on TV. it's not against the law to say "tit", but the corporate monitors won't allow it. Where is the federal law that says that putting up pictures of 15 year olds in a nudist setting is illegal? nudists aren't a protected class, like a religious argument, so i think on this point, ya, a 15 year nude girl in a nudist setting, with exposure of genitalia is CP. a pic of the gerber baby or the michelin baby is not CP. Where is the federal law that says that putting an 18 year old in pig tails and handing her a teddy bear and a lollipop is illegal? it's not, but sponsors are starting to say, if you are attracting visitors because you are given the implicit direction that you have underage models, then that's what they are fighting. it's not about the law.... we are far from wanting that, it's about internal practices. This whole point of sniffy is not just about dealing with that is legal, it's about what the sponsors want. if the sponsors say they don't want any websites that have a red background because studies show that it leads to violence in the homes, and the sponsors are against domestic violence, then sniffy or any other enterprising company that can fill the need will step in. having a red background is not against the law, unless of course it is accompanied by other bad things, but if the sponsor doesn't want red backgrounds on affiliate websites, that's their call and their requirement. so you either change your background to like mauve, or don't sign up with the sponsor. There is a tremendous difference between what is legal and what the majority of people, here or otherwise, consider to be acceptable. In one sentence you talk about legal, in another you talk about the things I have mentioned above basically as something you will sniff out and work to eradicate. Sniffy won't eradicate CP from the world, it only points the red flag. Sponsors won't eradicate CP from the web, they can only kick off those the don't want to be associated with. People who send in leads to ASACP won't eradicate CP, they can only report it. ASACP is trying to eradicate the world of CP by their active efforts in finding and tracking CP sites. That's what they do. The FBI eradicates CP by putting people in jail. -dj __________________ i can type, but i can't spel.