Quote:
Originally posted by dj_sniffy
why are you protecting the guilty? FreeAdultContent's assertion that sniffy could be used to frame a webmaster is baseless. Hearsay and conjecture is what gets webmasters framed, based upon their peer's own pettiness, greedy, or stupidity.
|
I am not protecting the guilty, nor do I think anyone raising such questions or concerns is. You brought this here to get feedback. You could have easily launched it without doing so, but alas you did not.
If my arguments are baseless then why in a former post say they are good questions yet legal ones. (paraphrased)
If your serious about this, and still want to make a profit from CP in one way or another for which you do. Then why not go about it the proper way and skip the sponsors all together. Market it directly to the billing companies. They are the top tier of this problem. Unless of course you do not wish to see legal troubles and it is best to drop a rung and deal with sponsors. Thus having to only deal with potential small webmasters with much smaller pockets to raise a fuse, afterall if you deal directly with the billing companies, you would risk a sponsor getting nabbed and them fighting back, which in my estimate would have a greater chance of fighting tooth and nail.
Quote:
Originally posted by dj_sniffy
if a private detective takes a picture of you banging another women that is not your wife, and your wife files for divorce, you guys are saying that you would sue the detective?
-dj
|
A husband and wife is not a business. Yet again with that type argument for an answer is unrelated.