Quote:
Originally Posted by baryl
I don't see any difference; they're both simulated rape.
I don't spend too much time watching rape porn because I find it vile and disgusting but what I've briefly seen is much tamer than both of those films I mentioned. Especially Megan is Missing which graphically depicts for about 20 straight minutes a 13 y/o girl being brutally raped and buried alive. That movie may be those most fucked up thing I've ever witnessed and you can fire that up on your Nintendo Wii any time.
|
And highlighted above is exactly the anti-porn argument.
"People get to the point where they are incapable of seeing the difference".
The difference is huge, accepting the difference and viewing the material is not the
same as viewing the material and not seeing the difference.
When you see no difference then you obviously are not even comparing the
work environment nor are you considering the impact of the environment on
the worker. You don't give a shit about a porn stars feelings, emotions or fear
of the work place or their right to work in a reasonable environment.
Nobody is shooting mainstream Hollywood movies with rape scenes while 5 guys
off camera jerk off to the scene so they can "add loads" to the cum shot.
You might do a mainstream movie part where you get ass raped in prison and
have no problem with the simulated ass rape. But if the director says "We want
this more realistic so, we won't show dick on camera but, you guys go ahead and
shove it in his ass". I bet you'll see the difference then.