You haters are hilarious. You dislike the article but instead of just letting it die, you continue to bump it to the top. You guys are the ones keeping the thread alive, not me. LOL
BTW, dumbass, neither I, nor the article said it was a consipracy. Maybe you should try learning to read before you graduate to posting. It simply says that even though Romney and Santorum got more votes, they are non binding so the delegates can vote for whomever they want.
Quote:
The crowning irony of the increasingly bizarre Iowa caucuses is that no actual delegates are committed. The part that really counts happens after the cameras are switched off, and the talking head panels have commenced their post-mortems.
But it’s possible a lot of those caucuses might end up producing delegates who vote differently than the people who trudged out to the big circus on Tuesday night.
|
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=48545
Quote:
Originally Posted by TCLGirls
Ron Paul is the secret winner of Iowa!!!!
The mass media is undertaking a vast conspiracy to undermine the greatness that is Ron Paul!!!
Ron Paul did not write or approve of those racist articles in the newsletters that he produced. He just did not know about those articles. He just paid to have the newsletter produced and distributed to 8000 subscribers. Ron Paul should not be held responsible for the things that he pays for and produces!!!!
|