Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirty Dane
Here, the other article does not use the phrase "at all", but "were not valid". And it doesn't explain what that means.
Further on, it doesn't explain if 37% are of the total amount of notices or out of those 57% (which would give 21%).
|
that bullshit analysis and you know it
no where in the article does it say that the non copyright notices only happened when it was a competing company.
it could exist in circumstances where the company is not a competitor
(like the mega upload example)
using copyright takedown notices for privacy issues, use of personal image are all inappropriate
and it does not only exist when your talking about competiting companies, in fact it happens more often in non competing companies (bloggers, news, free speech)
so it actually more likely to be over 80% are bogus, not 21%.
if you read the actual study you will notice it close to 67% because of the overlap.