GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum - View Single Post

jimmyf · 06-11-2003, 07:50 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by stevent37
This is scary as hell
All of the good questions have been asked and the answers where all tap dancing. freeadultcontent's post was the best and their is no way a program can work around the issues he raised.
and the statements you made in this thread....... spooky to say the least:

"Personally speaking, if I had an affiliate program I would use every tool available. It would be my moral fabric that dictated how my program operated. But that's me, and you are you"

No it is YOU this is your program so obviously it will be guided by YOUR moral Fabric, sorry Im a grown man, no more interested in working within your moral structure than any one else's.

"We have our own guidelines, and absorbing other ideas for determining what is CP"

Ahhh That clarifies your first statement

"Look at the bandwidth as your contribution towards the fight of CP."

No I look at the bandwidth issue as you stealing from me. Search engines spider sites to list, resulting in hopefully more traffic for me. Surfers look at sites to browse, hopefully resulting in more sales for me. You just want to burn my bandwidth so I can pass whatever test your moral compass leads to??? who do you think you are? I also run a restaurant. Paying customers come in and sit down. I keep bums out just like I do on the web.

"we could say that if someone is exhibiting or promoting images that makes one believe they are underage, then that could be flagged as CP"

Well Now that's orwellian isn't it? Lets flag people for every little sick fantasy they have hmmmmmm Guess that puts a whole lotta sponsors out of business that push teen sites, and Cheerleaders. How about those teen pictures with teddy bears. Isn't it funny that a sponsor with a ?no lolita? words allowed rule has content pictures of young ladies in pigtails with lollipops and teddy bears?, Hypocritical to say the least. Guess what fantasy they are pushing. Bondage, rough sex etc. must also qualify under that statement you made.

Some of you haven't figured it out yet but the only purpose things like this serve is to beat up the U.S., European, and Aussie webmasters. Why? Because while your explaining to your sponsor the word Ch@ld porn on your site was on a warning page, and trying to get your hard earned money back some third world webmaster just took your signups for the month. Right now some third world webmasters is reading this and laughing his ass off. He loves when shit like this happens because he isn't worried about the fbi or any of that shit. Your only hurting what is for the most part honest webmasters,.

However I do agree with one statement you made.

"For those that just hate the idea of what sniffy is doing, you could rally up and protest with your sponsors and boycott them should they elect to use the service."

Let me be the first to rally and boycott, sorry sir But I became an independent operator to get away from his type of "I'm looking over your shoulder crap." I dislike KP as much as the next guy or gal but that doesn't mean I will allow you to bring me into your personnel crusade against it, or allow your program to dictate how I run my sites.

I also have read the whole dam thing. stevent37 add your post to freeadultcontent's post, only two worth a shit. I *WILL NOT* use a sponsor that uses this software.