This is what always amazes me about Romney supporters is that they think he is such a great debater. He's not. He's a fucking stammering, stutterer for fuck's sake LOL - The only reason it does not come out more is because he's an entitled rich prick that knows the fix is in, but he has shown many times in the past when you get him on the ropes he really is a shitty debater.
Ron Paul is not the greatest debater either. There are many times when i am frustrated by him not saying something as a rebuttal that I know he knows, but he would still fuck up Obama in a debate for one reason, the truth is on his side. Even if the messenger is flawed, the message is still unassailable. The problem is a lot of his positions (while correct) are not easily explained by quick soundbytes, and frankly, most people are too dumb to know any better, but nonetheless, he is correct on most issues and I am certain in a longer debate format one on one he could articulate them much more clearly and would wipe the floor with Obama. The man simply has contradicted himself and gone back on too many promises to defend himself. The difference of why Paul could score points and why Romney couldn't is because Romney's positions are too close to Obama's so he would not raise them as an issue, whereas Ron Paul could.
And Obama and his handlers know that. That's why, truth be told, despite the rhetoric and what they would have you believe, Obama would be pissing in his pants to face off against Ron Paul in a debate.
Quote:
Originally Posted by **********
I would LOVE to see Mitt Romney try and debate President Obama. That poor bastard Romney would crawl of stage crying.
|