Quote:
Originally Posted by porno jew
russian webmasters. the end.
|
i disagree with that sweeping and outdated generalism because (correct me if I am wrong) Paxum both approved the account of the customer who commited fraud (which would have involved him proving his ID) AND approved the loading of the funds into Paxum which MUST have been in the same name.
The fact that the OP accepted these funds for a money exchange rather than selling hosting etc is immaterial.
Unless they have updated their TOS and removed "?(g) User agrees that all Transactions initiated are final and not reversible." I would say the OP has a case here and also has a point when saying that it is a warning for all other Paxum account holders that accepting Paxum is not as "final" as you might have thought.
