Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Markham
Not sure if anyone has pointed out to Giddumbass. No person charged, stuck in jail without bail and even in court has been "convicted".
|
Exactly
you and DWB are arguing that people who used mega upload in exactly the way it should have been legally used (as a backup only)
should lose their stuff because the government took away a service which under the law is still legal.
Quote:
When the jury foreman stands up, then Kim "the pirasite" Dotcom, will find out his future.
Dumbass GG, what you putting your money on? LOL
|
betting man i would say it will go the same way as youtube did
however i could be wrong.
The supreme court in Sweden refused to hear the appeal of the pirate bay even though the police admitted they didn't turn off dht when they were connecting to the swarm.
Any tech with half a brain knows that means that police were more likely to be getting the content WITHOUT any involvement from the pirate bay tracker.
In effect they got convicted of facilitating copyright infringement for a transaction they were more likely (less then 10%) to NOT be involved in at all.
As i pointed out above (with the Kiddie porn issue with nasty dollars) a shoddy argument like that getting thru has consequences well beyond just piracy arguments.
Imagine if the principle of proper police investigation allowed shoddy evidence to be used in any case, because "trust us if we had done our job properly, then the accused would have been involved" becomes the standard.