Quote:
Originally Posted by slavdogg
there is another trademark for "homegrown" in the entertainment category,
not owned by "homegrown video"
but same category as "homegrown video"
"
Word Mark HOMEGROWN
Goods and Services IC 038. US 100 101 104. G & S: Entertainment, namely, broadcasting of radio shows in the field of gardening; and entertainment services, namely, audio streaming and electronic transmission of entertainment media content in the field of gardening. FIRST USE: 20011001. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 20011001
IC 041. US 100 101 107. G & S: Entertainment, namely, production of radio shows in the field of gardening; entertainment services, namely, providing a radio program in the field of gardening via a global computer network. FIRST USE: 20011001. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 20011001""
By this alone it tells me no one has exclusive right to "homegrown" in the entertainment field. As there are at least 2 companies in the entertainment category with words "homegrown" in it.
i dont know, this might not be an open and shut case
|
You don't know. And that example simply makes my point, why don't you pull out an example that refers to adult content? The problem is you won't be able to unless it is ours; so, instead of playing your sophist games, why don't you present a balanced context and post our trademark text too? You obviously took the time to try and find that misleading example so why don't you post our mark so folks can really see the difference.
You don't have an axe to grind do you? Nothing from the past that you would like to share? Come on, get it out and you will feel a whole lot better...