Quote:
Originally Posted by pompousjohn
No, but I run several businesses with generic words in the title and would like to try to claim these are trademarks and "vigorously defend" them against people who outrank me in google.
You seem to be making a lot of noise about how open and shut this case is and it just smells like bulshit, I would be very interested to see how the whole thing plays out if someone were to call your bluff on it.
I am assuming these 8 points are actually weighed in court:
1 Strength of the mark
2 Proximity of the goods
3 Similarity of the marks
4 Evidence of actual confusion
5 Marketing channels used
6 Type of goods and the degree of care likely to be exercised by the purchaser
7 Defendant's intent in selecting the mark
8 Likelihood of expansion of the product lines
I think an argumentative person could make a strong case against you on points 1, 4, 6 and 7.
1 because I don't think your trademark is recognizable by consumers
4 because I don't think any reasonable person would confuse the OP's website for yours
6 because consumers of homemade porn don't care about the brand (it's supposed to be home made, not branded)
7 because the OP was not aware of your "famous brand" when he set up his website and made no attempt to make it look anything like your site or even function in a similar manner.
|
Allow me to rebuttal...
1. Newsweek Magazine declared Homegrown Video "the longest running series in the history of porn". US NEWS And World Report "Made by the people for the people Homegrown represents the democracy of porn"... I could go on but I assure you those would go along way to proving the first standard. Worked all the other times we have been down this road...
4. About half the people in this thread said it would be confusing and we could use this thread to show that.
6. Our customers tell us time and time again why our brand matters. We have tons of real letters from people making that clear that
our brand is the only one they trust. We have done this before so trust me that this one is not hard to prove either.
7. Looks like amateur content to me. Looks like it says Homegrown. Looks like it links to amateur content. It is not my problem if they didn't know or take the time to do any due diligence. It is my problem to let them know they are infringing, which I did.
Satisfied or are you still trying to play high powered IP attorney?