Quote:
Originally Posted by crucifissio
Oh what a great example...Microsoft is worth 219billion$ and your example just barely hit 1 billion...
Seems like my copyright model is exactly 219 times better? seems like my example employs exactly 219 time more people, pays 219 times more taxes, has a research budget that is 219 times more productive...
|
red hat original release May 13, 1995
microsoft United States (April 4, 1975)
that almost 20 years of compounded growth your talking about there buddy boy.
and they did so while giving their buyers all the property rights that people have with any other real world good (car, house, chair ...)
So pointing to a success artificially inflated by government granted control is really doing a good job at discrediting the statement "saying you can't compete with free is saying you can't compete period"
Quote:
Pray tell, what is the advantage of your "model"??? Even a retard can see the difference between 219 and 1...and lets not forget that your puny tiny little insignificant "1" is the absolute best example you could find? FOR FUCKS SAKE THEY GIVE IT AWAY FOR FREE and they still cant make anywhere near 219 LOL with your "model" HAHAHAHAHA
do I have to draw it out for you? ok look: a car is better than a bicycle get it now?
|
free market competition is always going to worth less then monopoly control to company who is selling the good.
The economic impact to all the companies who USE that product increase the more competition drives down the price.