Quote:
Originally Posted by potter
The article actually has a very good point, which would have had great appeal to discuss on this forum as it's a huge problem in this industry specifically.
However that ship has sailed, gideon ruined it by bringing his copyright debate up and sidetracking the debate into nonsensical bullshit.
|
you might want to go back over the history of this thread
I posted the title and the link to the article
and then corrected an economic theory mistake of bignasty (ignoring the supply side shift to higher profit margin business)
if fact i never mentioned any of my previous positions until someone else brought it up.
Quote:
I don't know why you bother.
In the real world the right to copy is what makes productive authors be productive and keeps leeches and parasites from making $$ by theft. Its how the rest of the planet, except for you and some "anarchists" sees it. In the real world you get to spend real jail time for theft.
Your argument that "it is not an exact copy" or that "nothing was removed just digitally time shifted crap" will only make the judge angry and give you more time.
This will never ever change. Ever. Not even the slightest chance.
You know why? Because money talks and everything else sucks dick especially the "rights" of non productive parasites. Big corporations employ 1000s of people and they have billions of dollars and on the other hand EMO "file sharing" parasite hippies have: SHIT.
You are pissing against a hurricane that will never stop, if you are lucky you may run out of pee but the wind will never ever ever ever ever change. Your efforts are as futile as protesting against the sun coming up tomorrow.
Seriously, its the weakest argument of all time and the most futile cause I can imagine.
|