02-16-2012, 06:45 AM
|
|
It's 42
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Global
Posts: 18,083
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Markham
Which is why we need a law that makes more than unreachable scum liable for the fine. Processors, advertisers should be in the dock as well.
|
1. MARK FARAGALLA and MINA FARAGALLA d/b/a www.PornVisit.com are California residents and their assets, if any, are attachable by a writ of execution of this judgment. So Paul. you are dead wrong they are not "unreachable scum" as you term them.
2. It is relatively easy to have a default judgment set aside by appearing before the court. A slam dunk in this case 
Quote:
Case 3:11-cv-03032-MWB;
[T]he modern day pirates at issue in this litigation do not wear tricornes and extract their ill gotten booty at cutlass point, but with a mouse and the internet. Nonetheless, their theft of property is every bit as lucrative as their brethren in the golden age of piracy. Plaintiff asserts a variety of copyright and trademark infringement claims against defendants concerning its adult motion pictures shown on defendants? internet website. Having obtained an entry of default against defendants, plaintiff now requests that I enter a sizable default judgment against defendants as a shot across the bow against further piracy. ...
|
|
|
|