Quote:
Originally posted by Kimmykim
I don't have a case here you mindless twit, what is so hard for you to understand? psychko is right, you have just done a 180 and are trying to play it off as a slight of hand. As usual you presume to know things that you don't, and you make statements you expect other people to take for real when they are blatantly false and definitely made up.
You speak of my company being in financial trouble? MY company is SpotBrokers, that I own in partnership with Backov. You are saying that WE are in financial trouble? That's definitely libel and slander right there missy, unless you have some sort of proof that SB is trouble, so I'll expect a retraction of that statement immediately.
If you think I'm kidding then I suggest you try me.
|
ive been lurking here for awhile, but this thread motivated me to register to make a quick comment
i notice many of you wave around your e-penis with threats of litigation - you probably should consult a lawyer before doing that, since doing this excessively and without merit is within the definition of battery in most (all?) states, but i'm sure you're aware of that.
second, check up on the definition of libel and slander - this is written, so it's not slander. slander is spoken word.
third, check up on defamation (collectively, libel and slander). you have to prove what was said or written was done with malice.
anyway, thats all. this isn't really directed solely at kimmy, just a pedestrian observation. and im not trying to get involved in the argument since i dont keep up on billing company drama. plus, it looked like nevermind's original comment was in regards to epoch.