Quote:
Originally Posted by kane
Nothing too shocking. Obviously he wasn't going to go on there and admit that they ignored DMCA. I have a feeling this is going to be one of those legal cases that could take a while to get through the system, however, when it does it could be precedent setting and it could be used as case law for future cases.
|
the safe harbor says
If it does discover such material before being contacted by the copyright owners, it is instructed to remove, or
disable access to, the material itself. [512(c)(1)(A)(iii)], [512(d)(1)(C)]
The entire argument is that disabling access is not enough you have to remove the file too.
but i do find it interesting that he is making the access shifting argument