Quote:
Originally Posted by Due
That's understandable. 3 times the same uploader? In weeks.
Why didn't he mention this in the first place when blaiming people? And why could the uploader still upload?
Had he verified in advance they where okay with this business model? He said everything was dealt with within 24 hours, but the 24 hour grace period isn't that just copyright notices? Did not think it would cover possible cp where you several places in the world can get thrown to jail for insinuating cp...
It would be cool if when something is taken to the board they give the full story, when leaving something out they probably have a reason for that and its usually not in their favour.
|
they should be okay with the business model, as they host another site for 1yr+ with the exact samesort of content...
The guy must of uploaded the 3 videos before the 1st abuse complaint, and all the videos contained the same watermark, so perhaps he was trying to get some traffic to his site with it