Quote:
Originally Posted by signupdamnit
Hmmm. What you are posting doesn't appear to match what RuthB is saying. You are saying that someone at the root "Account A" of this diagram committed fraud and that is it and that you are in position D4, right? But then in a previous post I think RuthB stated that there was a direct connection between you and the fraudulent transaction. What am I missing here?
|
I have published an approximate scheme. Paxum not want to see my questions . They took my money and silence everywhere about reasons. So I can only make guesses. I do not know real scheme. I do not know who I am. Maybe I am "C4" or "D10" or the "Z7" , but I know exactly what I had no contact with account "A".
If RuthB stated that there was a direct connection between you and the fraudulent transaction - he told a lie.