Quote:
Originally Posted by RuthB
There is a lot of conjecture in this thread. As TheSwed points out however, if the OP had actually received funds from a company for a legitimate purpose (such as traffic/sales), and those funds were refunded from their account due to fraudulent activity, shouldn't the person who originally sent the funds, then resend them?
|
thats fucked up question. why dont you reverse? you should refunded the funds from the sender not from the receiver since the receiver has nothing to do with the fraudulent sender.
thats his only concern
why him, not the sender?
now, you're ignoring his post and questions. you should answer them, many people here are reading this thread.