View Single Post
Old 03-16-2012, 11:34 AM  
gideongallery
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 7,082
To all the copyright holders who argued that lack of a designated agent means you lose safe harbor

http://www.techdirt.com/articles/201...iability.shtml

Quote:
1. That Counterclaimants Democratic Underground and David Allen have committed no volitional act giving rise to a claim for direct copyright infringement. Counterclaimants neither posted the excerpt nor encouraged the posting. Nor did they have any knowledge of the posting until after this suit was filed. See Religious Tech. Ctr. v. Netcom On-line Commnc?n Servs., 907 F. Supp. 1361 (N.D. Cal. 1995) (direct copyright infringement requires ?some element of volition or causation which is lacking where a defendant?s system is merely used to create a copy by a third party?); see also CoStar Group, Inc. v. LoopNet, Inc., 373 F.3d 544 (4th Cir. 2004) and Cartoon Network LP v. CSC Holdings, Inc,, 536 F.3d 121 (2d Cir. 2008).
__________________

“When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak
gideongallery is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote