Thread: CSS Gurus
View Single Post
Old 03-19-2012, 06:18 PM  
RazorSharpe
Confirmed User
 
RazorSharpe's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Scotland
Posts: 2,238
Quote:
Originally Posted by firequartz View Post
Again .. we're pretty much talking theory here. To my knowledge and at last check .. my sites render properly with "the big four" ... (last three versions of each anyway) ... but I think we do a potential disservice by making sites "too backward compatible" ... users should be encouraged to keep their systems as current as possible .. especially when it doesn't cost them anything. It's better for them .. and better for us in terms of the level of sophisticated experiences we can provide.

And if looking at naked people being sexy (or nasty) isn't motivation enough .. hell .. what is?
This is probably why you haven't been making sense to me. My issue isn't backwards compatibility but the issue in question is manifesting itself in the latest versions of FF and IE. I am not aiming for backwards compatibility at this stage but I will settle for it working like it should in current browser versions
__________________
Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning.
RazorSharpe is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote