Quote:
Originally Posted by sperbonzo
Then he should have vetoed it, if he didn't intend to use it. He could have lobbied in the Senate to have the clause removed. What do you think the "Party Whip's" are for?
Never mind, all you guys care about is what party does what, or says what about the other.
Totally hopeless...
.  
. |
If I remember correctly the bill was to fund the Dept of Defense, so if he vetoed it the republicans would have used that against him, but yes he should have vetoed it.