Quote:
Originally Posted by Nautilus
I second your math, both this and other estimations seem to be surprisingly accurate.
|
I third your findings. we went with one major Tube site, owned by AEBN. They put a link under the video worded like this. "See more of Paul Markham Teens."
The traffic was awesome. 10,000s of clicks a day via our CCbill coded link. On our stats program we saw the duration of 99% of the traffic. It went straight back.
So before any clown comes up with the crap content excuse.
I'm assuming they had seen the sample movie and wanted to "See more of Paul Markham Teens.". And the moment they realised it meant paying, they went straight back. They liked the sample, didn't bother to see what the site offered and no intentions of paying. As we added more content, the clicks on the links fell. They started to realise it was to a place that costs money.
This will probably happen to all submitters. because the more 7-10 minute clips they add to
their library of free porn. The less reason there is to buy a membership. Ruseful wants 7-10 minute clips, with a cum shot or orgasm. So adding 1 clip a week, will in a year put 52 reasons not to join, in a library of the uploader. Put up more and you have more reasons not to join.
Of course there is the methodology of "If I have enough traffic I can sell anything." Which is very true in the Porn Tube site model.
Creating a trailor that really sells a membership, of 7 minutes out of a 20 minute point and shoot movie without structure. Is bloody hard. Few can shoot a decent sample for their tours, they just hobble together a few of the sex clips from the content inside.
A trailer is designed to intrigue, lure and sell. A porn scene is designed to satisfy.