Quote:
Originally Posted by crucifissio
This was not my point. His site is nice, I would not be ashamed of owning it or what ever.
My point is that the girls are nothing special, NOT saying they are ugly or that there is anything wrong with them
The clips are well shot but still nothing special NOT saying they are bad
The chemistry in the clips is, you guessed it, nothing special and so is the niche: met art knock off...
The site content/layout is nothing special it is NOT ugly or bad its just no ferrarri...
|
It's a knock off of Met-Art and nothing special.
To be accused of being a knock off of Met Art, makes it special as few site get anywhere near that level.
My point?
Quote:
|
Not to knock on the quality of orgasms.xxx or the site, just to point out that it brings nothing special to the table, yes its not the same old "filler" porn, I never said it was, but it IS a copy of a copy of met-art and not done as well. Can I do better? Not the point of my post...
|
Pity so few do then.
Can many producers here do just as good material? <-------This is my point and the answer is YES
Quote:
|
So why is there not more love for the tubes? Why do producers keep saying that tubes are killing porn?
|
Because they are. This level of content would of sold better with TGP sites.
Quote:
|
Common sense is not to be overlooked sometimes...If a brand new middle class or upper middle class site like orgasms.xxx is getting 120 sales/day just from free tube traffic then you have to wonder why there are not more doing as well...
|
Well the only way to find that out is to get a "knock off" of Met-Art and test it. I admit we are just taking his word for it and I've been skeptical of that in this thread. IMO there are far better ways to get this level of content onto his tubes than asking people with "filler porn" sites, to fill his Tubes. He wins on this as it will give him at the minimum more traffic to sell. I have stated 90% will not duplicate his results.
Quote:
IMO tubes are the "lehman brothers" of porn...dishing out other peoples assets irresponsibly to push penis pills and dating and making nice $$$ while the baloon lasts...win win for manwin
Giving away more and more free porn longer and longer clips with a beginning, middle and ending and all top quality....LOL snap out of it eh?
|
Agree. Even giving out galleries with free porn killed some sales. A line of text and a soft core tour, would of been the best way not to lose sales. We all knew a better way. The problem was, we all knew the better way and we all did it.
The porn is special when compared with the rest of online porn. To accuse the porn of ripping off Met-Art and saying it's not special, is a contradiction. To rip off Met-Art is has to be special. Which is why there are so few doing that. To rip off a Tube site, isn't special, which is why so many do it.
I agree with you on the rest.
Quote:
Originally Posted by VenusBlogger
I was browsing adultcontent.nl and I see you still have lots of content for sell, and probably on other content sellers too.
So, it still generates some good passive income for you each month...
|
Yes, we kept the content ownership rather than shooting for others. so nearly 4 years after we stopped producing the money still rolls in.