Quote:
Originally Posted by Why
i thought you knew how to use google?
https://www.google.com/search?q=miss...ient=firefox-a
looks like i can watch the latest update on private.com/movies/ right there on google.com, took 5 seconds of time to find.
what other people do with other peoples content is in fact a matter of this lawsuit, being foreign i know you don't understand american law. we have precedent, and im pretty sure this exact topic has already been argued in US courts.
then again, i havent read the entire complaint, so its possible DMCA notices were ignored, in which case. he is fucked. Oregon is an interesting venue as well, i wonder how tech savvy their courts are. |
Google doesn't embed (publish) the content, only links to it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by react
I'm guessing Image Search has, once or twice.
|
I am yet to hear anyone complaining about Google Images making a dent in their bottom line. You basically need to run a lot of searches in order to get even half-a-set of related pics, in which case a TGP would be much more suitable for that very purpose.
Quote:
Originally Posted by react
Outside the scope/sets precedent. Tomato/tomato.
|
AFAIK there is no precedent, in terms of a lawsuit against Google, Bing et al. There are, however, a bunch of precedents of adult sites being sued successfully, or settling out of court. Again, boneprone is a very easy target and the only thing about this lawsuit that surprises me is that it didn't come about five years ago.