Quote:
Originally Posted by SleazyDream
IF???????
private's already won large lawsuits already protecting their content
that's why this is SCAREY for anyone embedding content without license or those who do not take down content when asked.
but good news for anyone who licenses, buys or produces content
anyone who's been buying/leasing or making content for their sites WANTS Private to win here - sorry mike but stealing content hurts a LOT of people. I pray Mike was not stealing content or if a mistake happened, he worked to fix it.
I had an advertiser use stolen content once. When the rightful owner contacted me, I dropped the client, and offered the rightful owner 2X what was paid for free to make up for the error in a show of good will. The rightful owner was more then happy. That's the thing, most people are VERY reasonable before going to court as court is expensive. I pray this is a misunderstanding, as I've had good dealings with Private in the past and they were always very reasonable and upfront about everything. Good Luck Mike, and I pray you can work this out with Private out of court.
|
Private has done embedding cases before? I ask because I do not know. Don't really follow it because it always seemed wrong to me.
So many people embedded tube sites these days to do trades with and it always seemed so wrong. I could never figure out why they thought they were different than a tube full of studios videos. If you click a lot of the embedded videos they are dead from a DMCA received by the original tube.
Another weird thing is that some people who claim to hate illegal tubes and blame them for decreased business somehow think embedding full length videos is somehow OK.