Quote:
Originally Posted by TheSquealer
Of course it will be introduced as evidence. Character, credibility and business practices matter when it comes to proving a pattern of conduct. Either you are a liar trying to convince everyone you are something you are not for many years, or you are that baller and you're lying to a judge and jury to convince them you're broke and portray yourself as a hapless victim of a big greedy corporation.
All he's done on this forum for years for the most part is brag about personal success.
Also, would you want to be sitting there being cross examined about AnalHobbit posts? Or that idiot character son of sam or whoever who was supposedly in prison for manslaughter or murder or whatever?
I'm guessing there will be no BP4L signs being thrown up in the courtroom.
Lawsuits of this kind are about making a point. I think the point in this case will end up being well made and well heard by all.

|
The Anal Hobbit thing could prove interesting. I don't know how he is in the court, but in real life Chad has a great sense of humor and could have some fun with that. Maybe Anal Hobbit is John Doe 47 and BP will have to explain him.
edit: plaintiff has requested a jury trial. I can only imagine all of the jurors sitting there listening to who Anal Hobbit is.