Any idea if Counts 7 and 8 were dropped?

There may be a silver lining in this as there were commercial transactions involved of so called "regulated deceptions" as well as obscene materials.

Quote:

[W]hen it came time for prosecutor Damon King to cross examine, the attorney stuck largely to the facts, questioning Isaacs on whether he or his employees had received orders for the videos his company LA Media sold, whether he had duplicated the movies and had sent them to the customers, all of which Isaacs admitted was done by him ... http://news.avn.com/articles/Isaacs-...es-474308.html

The videos depicted bestiality and scatology if that is art it's precedented as obscene art so why is anyone surprised? Things like this; pushing the legal envelope, do this industry injustice and further make us all the favorite whipping boy as a group, especially in an election year such as this. Who needs the grief? Who wants to be grouped in the publics eye with legally obscene material? We sure as hell don't ...

This kind of behavior furthers no cause for this industry notwithstanding that counts 7 and 8 relating to §2257 Recordkeeping, not having the transcript in front of me, were either dropped or he was found not guilty of, and this may be of value with regard to the current §2257 complaint pending hence the possible silver lining I spoke of above but citing this case probably is a no starter. Anyway I imagine the case's appeal is forthcoming but IMHO, futile.