For many simpleminded people, and Rick Santorum was pandering to these knuckle draggers, all porn is rolled up into one so when pornographers presuming to be "shock artists" present shit smeared body parts in a sexual context or cattle fucking women, which I am made to understand is the nature of the bestiality charges against Isaacs, of what socially redeeming value is that (Miller v. California (1973))?

If Isaacs wanted shock value he could have depicted dismembered bodies in war or other monstrosities in the real world.

This (bestiality or scat) serves no legitimate purpose or cause and unless you are a sociopath you won't miss it.