View Single Post
Old 05-09-2012, 08:21 AM  
tony286
lurker
 
tony286's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: atlanta
Posts: 57,021
Quote:
Originally Posted by raymor View Post
That's interesting. Of course, Obama's energy secretary has said their goal is to double the price of gas so more people will use electric. It kind of makes sense to think they CAN effect prices when they TELL YOU that they are increasing prices. In this particular case, it's another example of democrats choosing to not hear what the president is saying.

Last year Obama fought for a 18.4 cent tax on gas. Obviously adding 18.4 cents per gallon in taxes makes it cost more - 18.4 cents more.

There's also the recurring theme that Obama KEEPS coming out talking about more taxes on energy producers and more regulations, preventing drilling, preventing pipelines from being built, etc. Obviously when you make it illegal to build infrastructure to deliver cheap energy, you don't get cheap energy.

So one difference is that Obama has been actively working to get gas prices up, with a declared goal of doubling the price. It's not a question of CAN he effect prices, he's been doing so and announcing it.
http://mediamatters.org/blog/201203010019
(UPDATE 3/2 5:18PM An Editor's Note now appended to the Politico story says it "mischaracterized the testimony of Energy Secreatry Steven Chu." The headline, lede, and body of the story have been corrected.)

A Politico story fueling misguided attacks on Energy Secretary Steven Chu is not borne out by what actually occurred. The article titled, "Chu: DOE working to wean U.S. off oil, not lower prices," claimed:
tony286 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote