Quote:
Originally Posted by johnnyloadproductions
I jerked it to a lot of Paul's stuff right when I was coming into my teens. It passes the mark of quality. Please keep in mind a lot of his stuff is dated but it still looks great for what it is.
Everyone on here attacks him on here because it's the mindset. To not attack Paul (or bash one of his products or ideas) would I daresay be abnormal?
...but don't stop, he needs an encore of "GFY Troll of the Year"!
|
I truly don't care if they say it's crap or dated. It sold for a lot more than online paid. Magazine shooters shot what magazines wanted us to, because they were the biggest payers. If an Internet site had paid any of us more, we would of shot what they want.
Magazine told us to shoot what they knew sold. TGPs killed magazines, not changing styles.
Online porn's "style" was governed by what sites could afford to pay. Today we see a lot of sites coming out with "Sexart" style, harks back to the old dated styles.
Has the consumer magically changed or do people realise quality sells?