Quote:
Originally Posted by VenusBlogger
I will go further..
considering they can prove that your dynamic IP was used at that time and the IP came from your location, how can they prove someone else didn't access your WIFI router at that time and used your connection to do what they did?...
And you can go even further, in terms of legal defense, its 100% possible to prove that someone is not guilty...
|
Just because someone's shoe (or bloody glove) was left at the crime scene doesn't BY ITSELF prove they committed the crime either, it's one piece of evidence. Very, very rarely does a case rest entirely on only one piece of evidence, even now that we have DNA technology and certainly not before DNA.
Perhaps the IP was assigned to her ex-husband. Given that information, an investigator can check into it and perhaps they find that the ex-husband was talking shit about her offline the day. They world then compare the spelling and grammar mistakes in the posts to things the ex-husband wrote. They can drive by the house and check that his wifi isn't open.
Taking it all together, which is most likely - a) the angry ex-husband did make the post or b) some random person went into the ex-husband's house, used his IP to harass his ex, and overused semi-colons just like he does, and misspelled "whoor" just like does? That would be up to a jury to decide.