What's the difference between CCBill, NATS, and MPA3? I'm seriously interested.
Here's a cut and paste of my CCBill stats. Take it as you want - but I think I'll stick with them...
Trial. Single. Recurring. Rebill. Refund. Chargeback. Void. Total. Raw Clicks. Unique Clicks. Direct cut and paste - I'll leave it to you to sort it out...
$6,502.83
1,189 $3,230.89
151 $44,708.77
2,802 $62,824.73
4,355 -$1,273.23
90 -$420.94
23 -$64.95
2 $115,508.10
8,612 1,364,891
1:329.5 132,744
1:32.0
1:329 RAW. Includes "Affiliates Without Sales" - and there has to be 200 sites that I never made a cent off
. Ok, CCBill stats are a very loose estimate of reality. The money that they send me is not, though.
Sort it out for yourself. I'm looking at a ratio of 1:329 (Ok - stats tracking leaves a LOT to be desired...). I'll take that ratio anyday. The click tracking is a bit bizarre, 1:32 unique is WAAAY off, but the cheques arrive every week, and I'll cash 'em.
After all this, I'm not seeing the chargebacks, the declines, or the refunds that everyone bitches about.
The very, very few NATS and MPA3 programs I still promote bill through CCBill as part of their cascade. I'd LOVE to remove NATS and MPA3 sites from my portfolio, but I have a huge number of legacy sites that I need to keep online. Sites that aren't worth working on anymore.
I'll stick with CCBill and the smaller niche programs that use CCBill exclusively.