Originally Posted by PR_Glen

you really are reaching for a point that isn't even true.

who dies without autopsies?

Originally Posted by sperbonzo

Now if the government would just ban cars, traffic fatalities would go WAY down.
Ban pools and drownings drop quite a bit.
Ban alcohol and liver problems are cut by half.
Ban walking outside without sunscreen and skin cancer goes down.
Ban showers that don't have safety harnesses and slip and fall injuries decrease.
Ban skiing and injures on the slopes will disappear.
Ban skateboards and a ton of teenage trauma wounds would stop.
Ban any food with fat and there will be fewer strokes and less heart desease.
Ban large speakers and people won't hurt their hearing.
Ban.......




Lets just take away all choice and everyone will live to be a healthy 100 years old!



WOOOOOOHOOOOOO!!!!!!




.

Originally Posted by blackmonsters

I forgot to answer this part.

Given the fact that less than 10% of full time smokers ever develop cancer;
I think enviromental causes of cancer are greatly over looked.
It may be that cigarete smoking expands the effect of the environmental causes
in some people and thus getting rid of environmental causes may cut lung cancer
down to only 1% of full time smokers.

There must be an explanation why 90% of people who smoke full time all their
lives are living just as long and in many cases longer than non-smokers.
I say it's the environmental causes such as air pollution, fine particle inhaling
from construction materials in buildings, brake pad grindings, aresol sprays in home,
and pesticides. These take hold in an individual and are exacerbated by smoking.

Originally Posted by DWB

If you have to change states because you're too weak a human to quit smoking, you are a loser beyond anything the rest of the world can comprehend. They should make a new category of loser just for these people.