Quote:
Originally Posted by blackmonsters
I say if not paying is premeditated then it is rape.
She consented to be paid for sex, she did not consent to have sex for free.
It's a case of getting a "compliant rape victim" under false pretenses.
|
my understanding is without fulfillment of the contarct... i.e. getting paid... the contract is invalid and the content can't be used. this is why a releases has a line with signature/initial for compensation and why we keep receipts, canceled checks and tax papers on file.
several producers I know take a verbal statement on video, before and after the shoot, as well as scan the check... because while there are very creepy producers, there very creepy models as well. in fact only know 2 or 3 creepy producers, 1 or 2 creepy agents, but 15-20 creepy models.
and it's not rape by any means it's fraud. allegations of rape and fraud are completely separate issues. and you do realize that being a shooter in todays environment automatically make you wrong without any proof in the eyes of society. you can look at your own reaction to the allegations as an example... you are basing you views on internet message board hearsay and making assumptions.
hopefully you'll never be charged and tried on the internet by malicious hearsay.
