Quote:
Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam
The file lockers are low hanging fruit. They are easy to make a case against.
File lockers are not new Drop Boxes and innocent victims of their own users. They are conspirators in criminal copyright infringement when they run user upload affiliate programs.
What amuses me is all the support Kim Dotcom gets around here like he is some great anti-governmental hero.
The only difference I see claimed is the C/P aspect of the filelockers. If there is substance in those claims there should be criminal indictments forthcoming. The irony of this industry being the instigator of their indictments would be paradoxical in the end game.
Not only a tactical change -- it helps the tubes too. It's not that my enemy's enemy is my friend but more of a case of the pot finding a dirtbag that is coincidentally competing with the kettle.
|
Very true. File Lockers are very vulnerable via the funding route. Using C/P to fight them is merely a tool.
The flood back to buying porn online will turn out to be a trickle. We've spent far too long perfecting the ways of making buying porn unnecessary. Tubes will have more traffic.
