Quote:
Originally Posted by GregE
She doesn't need to.
She's already testified and whoever ends up on that jury will have already heard what she had to say.
|
I think you under-estimate the process and give John Q Public way too much credit when it comes to current events.
Quote:
Originally Posted by blackmonsters
Being described as "witness #9" just might be a clue bro.
 |
From what I read these are only people that were talked to by the DA. They call her #9 due to the circumstances of her involvement. But even if everything in your mind was true, not every witness that is desired by either party is automatically allowed to testify, and even then not everything they want to say is admissible.
I doubt it will come up in the trial.
