Originally Posted by Cherry7

Top shooter = magazine shooter = top shooter

sorry but that is where you are wrong. magazine porn was never good photography, it was banal repetitive photography, the same set up, just change the girl. Like passport photography or police crime scene, good for the job.

You think that wedding photography is a step up !

This is not to blame you, you have had no training, you admit you are no photographer. But please stop the begging for attention and lame attempts to show that you are an "expert" when all you reveal is your ignorance. Try not mentioning magazines for say a month.

This expert shooter of yours, has he an qualifications?
Has he had any photographic exhibitions, book credits? has he won any prizes? or is he from the same "no book learning" no school of yours?

Have you tried changing lenses on the digital camera yet?