Quote:
Originally Posted by wehateporn
Si,
Keep this one in mind for the future, at some point the UN want to ban all private property (they say this in their documents). They'll do it one way or another, but watch out for the manipulation that's used and engineered events (e.g. millions become homeless in the UK and US and it's blamed on private property ownership)
Though I don't know their timescale, I'm not going to bother buying any property myself knowing that it will be taken off me again in the future
|
It's already happening to some extent if that is "true" with Foreclosures etc.
Don't know about in the US, but look at all the council estates around the UK, the welfare system and the amount of homeless people you see, I don't see as many people on the street in the UK as you do in North America. Not saying there isn't any because there is. Will have to look that up.
And absolutely you could say private property does cause some people to become homeless.
But like I said, what is the outcome? Apparently they want to reduce the population right? Why not take away the very slim safety in place by government programs and charities to try and help these people out?
If you're going to rebuild a society, where do the homeless people fit into that theory?
They want the homeless people in community housing? Slave camps or what? But at the same time they want a lower population? Why not start at (what these people apparently don't see as their fellow man but a tool or resource) the bottom? Or don't want to keep the bottom people because they will be easier to control?
If the UK, US and the rest of whoever these people "are", really wanted that, they could pretty easily start right now by filing laws designed to limit rising house prices and debts.
See why I am a skeptic?
These nations must be working together already right?