Quote:
Originally Posted by baddog
I know this is going to be difficult for you to wrap your little mind around, but "Fantalis further asks the court to rule that porn can?t be copyrighted as it is not a ?useful art.?" is enough to convince even the most lenient that he downloaded porn, he just does not think it can be copyrighted.
|
so an ultra right wing religious person who would never watch porn could make that same argument.
btw even if he was not such a religious person he could still have bought porn on dvd and made that same statement.
all without ever downloading porn ever
And still doesn't mean he downloaded it from the torrent as he was accused
he could have paid for porn thru a membership and still not admitted to the copyright infringement he was accused of.
That 3 possible ways he can still oppose porn right to be copy writable and still not "admit to the crime" he was accused of.
if porn is not copyrightable as he accuses he wins because the entire claim is nothing more than a shake down of "we will tell everyone you downloaded porn" extortion.
As many you have quoted here that the reason people settle with you not because their guilty.