Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery
he did
2. denied in its entirety, including the footnotes
3. defendent has no personal knowlege of any of the movies referred to by plaintiff.
4. denied.
5. defendant denies that the plaintiff has any cause of action against him
and so on.
|
I nailed it. It was too tough for you to wrap your brain around. Thanks for proving it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DamianJ
Don't they still have to do that thing in Americanland, what is it? Oh yes. Get PROOF?
|
They have proved it, that is why it is going to a court of law . . . the formalities. If he was innocent it never would have gone this far.
