Quote:
Originally Posted by isteve
Paul,what you seem to not understand is that in my example, the licence never got sold. An entity, in this case a business, not a business owner or a person bought the licence. Its none of your business to know who owns the business and if new share holders buys shares.
|
So selling the shares isn't selling the business. Got you.
Quote:
|
The Licensor may (or will) revoke the license if any of the terms or conditions of this license are violated, if Licensee declares bankruptcy, sells or closes the business
|
Will need to rewrite this part to make the spirit of the license clearer to people who are looking for ways to ignore it.
Quote:
Please, re-read my post. I never said i knew how much Shap sold for.
However I know on how many months of profit manwin base their price and how much gaytube makes monthly. You can quote me on this.
|
Great then all we do is quote you what Manwin paid for the Tube site alone. This idea would include Tube sites. 3 years profit on a Tube site seems a very good deal, more people should open them.
This idea was to give those without the option of having someone like Manwin offer them 3 years profit on any site, another option. Is that so bad?
4 years after stopping really working on Paul Markham Teens we made 4556 Euros in sign ups, yes I have a screen grab, but you'll shout Photoshop so won't bother to post it. Sorry wrong on that, it was only CCbill so add a few for Epoch. So selling out for 3-6 months turnover isn't worth the bother.