Quote:
Originally Posted by sperbonzo
No. There was no defense. That's the point of the ruling. Read it again please.
.  |
you are quoting a very old post.
And I would say that when a big company is going to fire a shot across your bow, force you to hire attorneys and force you into a court room, you've lost. They redirect the domain to .no because they anticipated that. Now the question is simply one of jurisdiction and venue. They can still file a new lawsuit in the proper jurisdiction and copyright/trademark law isn't exactly a local thing. Why is there so much certainty that "its over" - there is no settlement agreement. There is a simple procedural obstacle and can be easily stepped around.