Quote:
Originally posted by marsgur
1. If you move away from the object with the speed of light, and look with the telescope on what is going on with the object that you are leaving, you will see the still frame as the light from the object will be traveling with your speed. So the image will be frozen.
2. If you stop immediatly, you will be able to see what is going on at the object that you left, with normal speed from the point of time that you left the object.
3. read number 2 again
4. Still watching the object that you left you start going back with the speed of light ...
the events that you will see in the telescope will happen faster since you are going with the speed of light against the "video" that is fed to you at the speed of light. (I doubt you would notice it... 
5.read 4 againg couple of times, its kinda confusing
6. at the time of your arivall you will catch up with the events that happended during #1 and #4
therefore you will not see time delay/shift
|
Ehm... I believe #1 is flawed. Since you are travelling at the same speed as the light particles, they will not "catch up" with you, and thus will not enter your telescope and your eyes. So, you would need to travel at almost the light speed to achieve a "video", which would be near still, and which would be very weak since your light feed will be very small.
Also, in 4 the "video" would be twice as bright as normal
