06-20-2003, 10:25 AM
|
|
Guest
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Lane
12clicks,
Do you have a better argument than "this is not true" ? I at least studied this stuff in numbers. Alot of this stuff is proven. Since I did not major in physics, i can't tell you all the details about it. But your approach to the subject is totally wrong. You can't think so simple if you're gonna debunk someones theory that heavily relies on math and numbers. Einstein was not a philosopher, he was a scientist. Simple thoughts doesn't mean anything unless you can show a stable equation.
Are you familiar with the "theory of everything"? Its already 75% complete. Soon they will be able to explain the interaction of all forces in harmony.
How familiar are you with quatum physics? Do you have any idea how complicated it is right now? Nobody can grasp this stuff. Its all in numbers and equations. They say there is 20-something dimensions, while we can sense only 3. Do you think it is even possible to picture these things in your head?
A 2D picture is painted on a surface of a 3D object. We also live in a 3D world on the surface of a 4D universe, which is expanding. The expansion has been proven with the observation of galaxies and their speeds. Its like an inflating baloon. If you keep going in one direction, you will eventually go around the 4D object and come to where you have started. Light also goes around this 4D object, which actually is not a straight line. If you draw straight line on a baloon, it will be an arc in the 3D view. Its the same thing here. A straight line in a 3D world is actually an arc in 4D, so its not the shortest path. If you have the chance to go inside the ballon and travel through it, you would take a shortcut.
Also the shape of the universe is bent by gravitational forces, which also changes the route of light, and makes the path longer.
You also seem like you don't know much about the dual properties of light and why it has a mass.
I don't have the time or the teaching skills to explain it all right now, but I can see for a fact that your approach is wrong and too simple to disprove anything.
|
if you have time someday, pelase teach me! 
|
|
|