Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirty F
Ok, this is getting stupid. I'm gonna try one more time to explain things to you. The last time. After that i give up.
I'm not claiming i know everything. Or how the universe works. I'm very open minded to the fact that there could be tons of "things" we can't see (yet). But right now there is absolutely no reason to believe that the chances or there being angels are bigger than the chances of there being flying elephants. Again: can't you really not see what i'm trying to say? You say there is evidence of there being angels. No, there is not. Absolutely no evidence whatsoever. There just tons of believers (like you) who want to see angels and then obviously claim they did. Why no flying elephants? Because nobody cares about flying elephants. It's that simple. If flying elephants could heal, come from heaven, were sent by God, warn people or whatever idiot story you can think of then all those people would instead see flying elephants and you, as a believer, would claim there is evidence that flying elephants exists. This has everything to do with religion and wanting to believe and nothing to do with critical thinking (which for some reason you seem to think you're doing).
If you still don't understand how wrong you are then so be it. Nothing i can do about it obviously. Maybe you should smoke less drugs.
|
You're a frustrating person to talk with lol... You keep telling me that I'm a "believer" and I "want to believe" even after I have repeatedly told you that's not true.
I don't believe in angels, I believe in the possibility that angels might exist. Do you see the difference? I'm not going to say that I believe angels exist, because I don't know if they do or not. Is that clear enough?
And you're not being fair to people who have claimed to experience some sort of alleged extradimensional phenomenon because you already have your mind made up that they are crazy and did not experience what they claim. So it's pointless for someone like you to even look at the evidence (yes, that's what it is because part of the definition of the word evidence is "To support by testimony; attest," which has already been explained for you).
You claim it all has to do with religion but that's not true. Other dimensions which might contain sentient lifeforms of some sort could exist as quantum physics is beginning to explain regardless of what any "religion" has to say about it.
You even just said that you are "very open minded to the fact that there could be tons of 'things' we can't see," but then in the same paragraph you bash people who claimed to have experienced just that... something we can't see. Contradictory much?