Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt 26z
Let's roll with the belief that homosexuality is a naturally occurring flaw of nature just like any other mental or physical birth defect.
Now what?
These people and their sexual disorder are there and society can't change that. There is no cure and it isn't the type of disorder you can lock someone up for having.
Their same sex attraction feels as natural to them as yours does to women. Purely from a standpoint of doing the right thing, why would you want to deny them the same rights as straight couples?
What you are saying is "Oh, sorry, you were born with a defect. So you can't pursue certain types of happiness with someone who is like you because I think it's too gross."
Does the same argument apply to couples with downs syndrome or dwarfism? Each is a defect of nature. Since couples with downs can't function in society the same way straight people do, should they not be allowed to marry? And since dwarfs are highly likely to have a dwarf child in their family, should they be denied marriage also?
You need to take a few steps back and reevaluate your views on human existence.
|
I love that everyone is reading my comments as though I'm a heartless motherfucker that thinks gays should not have rights. Try reading my posts again if that's the case.
I believe that the state should get out of the marriage game. Partnerships, that's all they care about. Partnerships. Allow partnerships of anyone whom wants to make one. Make the benefits and whatnot equal. If aunt Tessie and Aunt Gilda want to be in a partnership so that they can benefit from the contractual arrangement; have at it. No sexual concerns even involved.
Make the arrangement equal and get the fuck away from a word. Otherwise there will always be exceptions that feel slighted. Get the gayness away from the issue and equalize it across the board.
As far as my views of human existence are concerned, I appreciate your concern for me. I'm just fine.