Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie
Yes...when people want a product they buy it which means you need more people to create that product and sell it.
|
Look at the labels of what you buy to see where it's created. Where will the extra money come from to employ more shop workers? And then factor in the robots in todays world.
Quote:
|
That's not any different in the "21st century ecosystem" than it has been since the beginning of fucking time. lol
|
you would think better if you joined us in the 21st century. Your thinking is mid 20th century.
Quote:
|
And those jobs don't appear by magic. People are hired by the guy who was smart enough to come up with the idea of marketing a particular product, put his blood sweat and tears in it, takes the financial risk, etc.
|
Where are the goods you buy made?
Quote:
|
It IS the business owners who are the "job creators" (what a dumb phrase that is). Without getting hired by "rich" people....nobody would HAVE a job.
|
Bullshit. If you employed people you would now it's a businessman's biggest expense. It's his job to cut the bill. Which is why it says made in China on the underside of your keyboard, on your phone, shirt, trousers, pants, cameras and so much more. Don't nit pick you know precisely what I mean.
Quote:
I suggest to you that it would.
If I saw that I was going to lose a few million dollars from capital gains being raised...I would immediately (as would EVERY person with investments) be advised to move it to another country or some other method of NOT losing that money.
It's a great way to further lose investment in the U.S. and have people bitching about "rich" people having their money in other countries.
|
So Mitt banks in the US along with all of his other buddies. They will move their money and jobs to wherever they get the best return, because few of them give a shit about anyone but themselves. They would move it to the Caymans for a 1% better return and the Caymans will always be cheaper the the US.
Robbie, simple questions. If you found a way to earn an extra $100 a week, would you not take it. If you were only to get $85 of that money instead of $87 you get today? You pay 13% in taxes.
Or, if you were to earn $100,000 and get only $85,000. Would you not work harder to get the extra money back into your pocket. Than if suddenly you were to get $89,000?
In fact do you work harder today when it's tougher, than you did when it was much easier in online porn?
No wonder you want me quarantined.